Intro:
Hifiman has been known for a characteristic tuning that can be divisive at times. Treble‑sensitive listeners often find some of the brand’s planar headphones a bit bright. This has been especially true for parts of the “Stealth” model era, where certain models carried extra upper‑treble energy.
When the Edition XS launched in 2021, I was excited by the value it offered, and it went on to become one of the brand’s most talked-about models. Now we have the new Edition XV, officially positioned as its successor. It features an updated headband with improved ergonomics and a sleeker aesthetic. Hifiman also claims the diaphragm is “60% thinner” than that of the XS and that the magnets have been revised to use “rare-earth-free materials”.
But does the Edition XV really follow the XS in sound? Let’s dive in.
For those who want to jump right into detailed measurements, check out the final section of this article.
Disclaimer: This unit was purchased for testing and review purposes.
Specs & Comfort
Price: $399 USD / $749 AUD
Driver size: 130*95 mm (frame); 80*50 mm (effective)
Driver type: Planar Magnetic
Sensitivity: 92 dB/mW @1kHz
Impedance: 13 Ω at 1kHz
Connector: dual 3.5 mm TRS
Weight: 453 grams (excl. cable)
Clamping force: medium
Comfort: 6.5/10 (slightly weighty; tiny bit clampy)
As shown in the last photo, the new headband now has cup swivel. The range is somewhat limited though (around 10 to 15 degrees) but it still improves fit and comfort compared to previous designs.
Measurement & Sound
For more comparisons, visit my squiglink database.
Tonal balance:
Overall, the Edition XV sounds smooth, liquid, and full-bodied — probably not what I would call the typical Hifiman sound signature. My first impression was simply that, wow, this is unusually smooth, almost reminiscent of a Meze planar or even a Sennheiser, particularly in the treble balance.
Bass
The Edition XV’s bass is flat and linear in the planar tradition, but slightly elevated as a whole. It leans toward the thick, meaty side rather than the leaner, tighter character found in many other Hifiman models. In that way, it reminds me somewhat of Audeze’s approach, though not quite as dense or tactile.
Compared to models like the Ananda Stealth or Arya Organic, which exemplify tight, punchy bass, the XV takes a different path. The bass has a slightly looser, more relaxed quality, though it still reaches effortlessly down to 20 Hz. In terms of quantity, it delivers a satisfying, robust foundation that supports the rest of the spectrum. Fundamentals feel rich and full-bodied, giving music extra note weight without sounding bloated.
Midrange
The mids on the Edition XV are smooth yet remaining articulate. Looking at the relationship between midrange fundamentals and harmonics, the XV reverses the style found in many earlier Hifiman planars. Here, the midrange fundamentals are slightly elevated while harmonics are gently toned down — both shifts are modest (around 1.5-2 dB), but together they create a noticeably fuller, more polished presentation compared to its predecessor, the Edition XS.
As a result, vocals and instruments carry more body and warmth. Listeners who found older Hifiman tunings too “analytical” may find this easier on the ear. That said, the classic “Hifiman dip” in the 1-2 kHz region is still present, which pushes vocals and some midrange instruments a bit further back in the mix. A milder dip could bring more liveliness and presence, but even so, the XV still handles vocal-centric genres like country and pop with ease and enjoyment.
Treble
The Edition XV continues the smooth, almost lush tuning into the treble. Gone is the spicy, sometimes edgy treble of earlier models like the Edition XS or Arya Organic. Instead, the XV delivers a top end that almost reminds me of the Sennheiser HD6X0 series, with its very linear, refined rise and a gentle, natural roll-off beyond about 5 kHz.
This is immediately visible in measurements, but also clear in listening. Cymbals sound clean and well-shaped without splashing into excessive brightness. There’s no hint of harsh vocal sibilance, and upper treble energy is carefully controlled — more in line with something like the FiiO FT1 Pro than traditional Hifiman planars. As a result, the XV trades some of the brand’s trademark air and brilliance for a softer, more forgiving presentation.
While this tuning broadens its appeal to listeners who prefer an easygoing treble, it may leave some long-time Hifiman fans wanting more treble detail and sparkle. This is a classic example of the trade-off between tonal balance and perceived technical performance — in many cases, what listeners interpret as “resolution” is the product of targeted treble energy rather than a true increase in driver capability.
As a whole, this is why I find it odd that Hifiman markets the XV as a successor to the Edition XS — the two follow very different tuning directions. In fact, the XV is much closer in character to the Edition X V2, a headphone often remembered as the smooth, mellow outlier of the egg-shaped family and one that developed a loyal following for exactly that reason. Interestingly, my measurement align closely with Hangout Audio’s measurements of the Edition X V2 (both on the GRAS 43AG platform, coupler differences aside). So in many ways, the XV feels less like an XS sequel and more like a modern update of that Edition X V2 sound.
Other qualities:
- Soundstage
The Edition XV’s soundstage is competent but not especially expansive. It doesn’t have quite the same sense of width or openness that some of the egg-shaped Hifiman models are known for. That said, it avoids sounding closed-in or claustrophobic, maintaining a generally natural spatial impression when the music calls for it.
Imaging is a touch softer and more diffuse than I’ve heard from other models in this family as well. Instead of sharply etched positional cues, the XV leans toward a more blended, though cohesive presentation. This works well for relaxed listening but sacrifices a bit of the pinpoint accuracy that some listeners seek for gaming or complex orchestral work.
Where the XV works well is in depth projection. Layering between front-to-back elements is handled naturally, with a convincing sense of distance and separation between instruments. While not a stage-width champion, it offers a comfortable and immersive space that works well across most genres.
- Clarity
Clarity on the Edition XV is good for its price bracket, though it doesn’t quite push into the higher tiers among planars. Its tonal balance is generally linear across the spectrum, so you don’t feel like any frequency range is missing.
That said, in this case the upper-midrange dip has a noticeable impact on perceived resolution. Because that 1-2 kHz region is slightly recessed and the midrange fundamentals are fuller, the presentation is smoother but also less revealing. Micro-details in vocals or the fine texture of strings don’t stand out quite as much as they do on a more forward-tuned headphones. It’s often a trade-off between tonal balance and what’s perceived as technical performance — much of which is shaped by frequency-response quirks and, to a lesser extent, measurable factors like THD and driver matching.
In practice, I would rank the XV’s clarity significantly higher than the Sennheiser HD6XX, slightly above the FiiO FT1 Pro, but behind the Ananda Stealth. It strikes a nice balance between detail and fatigue-free listening, but it’s not chasing pure analytical performance.
- Dynamics
Dynamics on the Edition XV are decent, but not class-leading. In terms of microdynamics — small-scale shifts and nuances in quieter passages — it outperforms most dynamic-driver headphones in its price range. Subtle changes in vocal expression, the decay of piano notes, or the gentle rise of a cymbal swell are rendered with a sense of gradation rather than feeling flat. Compared to other planars, however, it’s not as finely shaded as models like the Moondrop Para 2 or the Ananda Stealth. In very busy passages, the presentation can blur slightly, with finer details losing some definition.
On the other hand, macrodynamics — slam, impact, and large-scale swings — are satisfying. The XV has no signs of compression even when pushed to high levels around 100 dB, which speaks to the driver’s excursion capabilities. When the music calls for big bass drops or dramatic hits, it delivers with authority and weight.
Conclusion and value:
At $399 USD/ $749 AUD, the Hifiman Edition XV offers a sound that is both easy to enjoy and largely balanced straight out of the box. Its tonal profile stands apart from much of Hifiman’s recent lineup, harking back to the smoother, fuller presentation of the Edition X V2 rather than following the brighter, more analytical path of the Edition XS. For listners who have found past Hifiman models a bit too sharp in the treble or lean in the mids, the XV will likely be a welcome change.
Does the new XV edge out the XS? Not necessarily. The Edition XS remains relevant, and even highly competitive, thanks to its different tuning and its current aggressive price of around $239 USD.
I’m glad to see Hifiman broadening its tuning range. The XV’s sound profile could appeal to a wider audience, especially those coming from dynamic headphones who want to explore planars without the fatigue that sometimes comes with extra treble energy. The updated headband, with its added cup swivel, improves comfort and fit, and the new silver finish gives it a modern, more premium look compared to the XS.
In short, the Edition XV is not a direct sonic successor to the Edition XS, but a different flavour within the egg-shaped family — one that blends smoothness, warmth, and enough technical ability to stay competitive in its class. It’s a reminder that technical performance isn’t always about chasing every last detail — sometimes the right tonal balance delivers a more enjoyable listening experience.
If there are specific comparisons with other headphones you would like to see, let me know in the comments.
PROS:
+ Smooth, fatigue-free tuning across the spectrum
+ Full-bodied bass with linear extension
+ Decent depth and layering
+ Comfortable updated headband with swivel cups
CONS:
– Less sparkle than typical Hifiman tuning
– Soundstage width only average
– Slightly recessed upper mids affect clarity
– Imaging less precise than some competitors
Value Grade:
Earpads and EQ
A quick heads-up on the earpads: the Edition XV, like other recent egg-shaped models since the Unveiled series, uses redesigned plastic mounting clips on the back. This means pads from older Hifiman models won’t fit. At the time of writing, there are no aftermarket options available, though hopefully that will change soon.
In terms of EQ, this headphone requires little adjustments to sound well-balanced. That said, there’s still room for fine-tuning.
The main direction here would be to give the treble a slight lift for clarity, while tightening the bass response and adding a bit more punch.
My EQ setting for this headphone (adjust first and last filters to taste):
Preamp: -4.0 dB
Filter 1: ON PK Fc 30 Hz Gain 4.0 dB Q 0.500
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 170 Hz Gain -2.5 dB Q 2.000
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 400 Hz Gain -1.0 dB Q 2.500
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 700 Hz Gain -1.5 dB Q 1.500
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1700 Hz Gain 3.0 dB Q 1.600
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 16500 Hz Gain 3.0 dB Q 1.000
If your goal is to EQ the response to match the Harman Target, consider the AutoEQ function provided by Squiglink as a convenient starting point. I personally recommend customising the filters to better suit your own hearing, especially in the treble. While the AutoEQ provides a useful baseline, individual adjustments can often significantly improve your listening experience.
If you’re new to EQ, I’d recommend checking out this video by Resolve from The Headphone Show — it’s a really solid intro and walks through the basics in a clear, no-nonsense way. Great place to start!
MEASUREMENTS
Frequency Response:
The response is obtained by an average of 5-6 positional variations. The FR shown on the graph is unsmoothed.
Positional Variation:
This graph illustrates how headphone placement on the head affects perceived tonal balance: with the ear positioned at the front (blue), centre (purple), and back (red) of the headphone. The FRs shown on the graph are 1/48 octave smoothed.
Leakage Tolerance:
This graph demonstrates how leakages to the front volume can result in FR change: blue (good seal), purple (thin arm glasses), red (thick arm glasses). The FR shown on the graph is 1/12 octave smoothed.
Comment: Like most open-back planars, this headphone can show a slight bass boost when the seal is compromised. This is partly due to its large driver size and relatively low diaphragm tension.
Linearity and Dynamic Compression:
Linearity and dynamic compression testing plots the headphone’s frequency response at two input levels to show how it reproduces signals as loudness changes. Any divergence between the high-level and low-level curves points to where the transducer’s dynamic range begins to compress or distort. Here, the measurements are superimposed to allow direct comparison.
Comment: This is excellent result. There’re no signs of compression at high SPLs.
Impulse Response:
The impulse response test measures the initial response, overshoot, and decay of a transducer upon receiving a signal. An initial upshoot indicates a normal polarity, vice versa.
HpTF Variations:
Headphone Transfer Function (HpTF) describes how sound is shaped by headphone design and ear anatomy before reaching the eardrum. Different measurement rigs (with varying pinnae designs) introduce unique reponses/resonances and potential deviations from actual human perception. Understanding HpTF helps translate measured data into real-world listening experiences.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD% 2nd-9th) & Excess Group Delay (94 dB):
These measurements are conducted in quiet, normal room conditions (as opposed to an anechoic chamber), meaning there may be some influence from ambient room and external noise. These results should be considered a preliminary assessment of performance, primarily for identifying major issues, and do not reflect the best-case performance scenario.
Comment: 94dB distortion levels are slightly higher than ideal in 1.5kHz to 6kHz range are slightly higher than ideal. However, they should remain largely inaudible under normal listening conditions.
Channel Matching:
Channel matching graphs are intended for quality control checks and do not relate to the perceived sound profile. A specialised configuration is used in this test to capture differences between channels, mitigating interference from positioning on the rig and the asymmetry in the GRAS pinnae design, a legacy of KEMAR. The left (blue) and right (red) channels are measured using a flat plate coupler with an IEC60318-4 ear simulator.
Comment: Channel matching on this particular unit is good, which may contribute to imaging precision and the clarity of spatial cues. The slight “wobble” in the mids is likely due to modal response of large planar drivers, which can vary between measurements or under different conditions.
Electric Phase & Impedance:
The above graph shows the measured impedance (green) and electric phase (grey), measured under free-air condition (minimal front volume coupling).
Comment: This headphone’s impedance curve is typical of a planar headphone – flat and low.
END OF THE ARTICLE
Disclaimer: This review is independent and was not sponsored or endorsed by any company or affiliated entity. All headphones reviewed are purchased for review unless otherwise stated. Any links or product references are provided for informational purposes only and are not associated with any financial compensation or affiliate arrangement.
hi sai Is there a metallic or grating sound?
On the XV? Nope, none of that. It’s one of the smoothest-sounding planars out there.
yes XV thx Sai
The Moondrop Para 2, Edition XV and Ananda Nano, are now all 3 around the same price +- 350 euros. It seems that those are the 3 best headphones at that price range, from what I gathered these past days of researching. But be sure to let me know if I missed something.
My question is the following, I have recently got myself a dac/amp fiio k11, and I’m looking to get my first pair of proper planar magnetic headphones. I have had a Sennheiser HD 58X Jubilee for 7 years now, I always just plugged it into my pc or phone headphone jack, and I love the way these headphones sound. The fact that they are “easy” to drive is why I bought those over the HD 6XX, another factor was that reviews mentioned that the HD 58X while not as clear had really nice bass which the 6XX and in general Sennheiser headphones lack. Back then and now still I mainly listen to hiphop and drum and bass and a bunch of random music, and I absolutely love how these genres sound on my HD 58X. But now that I have a proper dac/amp I am looking to acquire a pair of headphones that can make proper use of them, and from what I have found looking online people are raving about planar magnetic headphones.
So in the price range of around 400 euros or I guess 450 dollars what would you recommend? I’m just really curious to experience planar magnetic drivers and the difference they make. Do you think I should lean into the bright planar magnetic (Hifiman) sound and get something like the Ananda Nano or Para 2? But I would of course still like for my preferred genres to sound good. And when reading the review on the XV you describe it as more warm and relaxed, and this reminded me of the way my HD 58X have always been described, you just plug them in play whatever and it sounds great. I would also be mostly using them behind my PC, listening to music, but also playing video games and watching videos, so it would also be nice if they are comfortable and not fatiguing.
Sorry for the whole life story 😉 I am just trying to make an informed decision but this hifi/midfi space is so confusing, the pricing fluctuations and discounts from chinese websites, and it feels like every month the “new best deal in audio” is released. My HD58x have served me for 7 years and I am sure they will for many years to come, so I am looking to make a purchase with longevity again. Thanks for any help!
No worries mate that all makes sense. If you want a safe bet, I’d go for the Edition XV. It’s closer to your HD58X in that it has a warmer, lusher tuning, more on the conservative side, so it’s an easy step up for someone used to Senns. Hard to go wrong with it, though the clamp/fit could take a bit of adjusting if you’re coming from the 58X.
If you want a different flavour and more of a “wow” factor, then the Edition XS or Para/Para 2 would be the way to go. They give you more impact, clarity, openness, and extension up top. None of them are hard to drive, so your K11 will be fine. I added the Edition XS to the list given that it is being discounted quite heavily nowadays and offer excellent value for money.
Since the HD58X leans warm but not really dark, I think you’d actually be comfortable with either path: the XV for familiarity and smoothness, or the Edition XS/Para/Para 2 if you’re curious about the more typical planar sound. If I were you, I would probably go for the Edition XS for now just to see what the fuss is about. And if you don’t like it, it’s a very popular model so you can easily sell them on the used market and not lose much given the lower cost. Fit-wise, I also find it more comfortable than the other planars mentioned.
Thank you very much for your reply, you’re right I should probably not break the bank and try the Edition XS first to see if I even like the planar sound. Okay then one final question, currently the Edition XS and the Ananda Stealth are almost exactly the same price. I have heard some negative things about the headband of the Edition XS. Besides the Headband is there any difference between the Edition XS and the Ananda Stealth?
No worries mate, happy to help. I’ve only spent time with the earlier Ananda Stealth, but sonically it sits between the Ananda OG’s soft, airy, ethereal vibe and the Edition XS’s more V-shaped, energetic presentation. The XS headband is pleather so it can peel over time, and some people find the top pressure spot a bit rough. Personally I find it comfier than the Ananda Stealth since it has swivel, but that really comes down to individual fit and preference.
Fantastic write-up, my nigga! Gonna look at the big brother HE600 next?
😉 let’s just say the HE600’s sitting in the wings…
Incredible news! Comparisons with HE-6, HE6se and NAN-7 coming?
I can do that.
Thank you so much for the detailed reply! I was leaning towards the XS and you’ve made the choice easier, much appreciated!
No worries, glad it helped!
Hi Sai, Love your work! I was planning on buying the edition xs before these got released, can you help me decide? I absolutley adore the HD560S and hate the Meze 99 neo, What do you think i would enjoy more the XS or the XV?
Hey, glad you enjoy the reviews. Given your preferences, I tend to think the safer choice is the Edition XS. It has a more neutral-bright balance with that open, clear presentation you’re used to.
The Edition XV is also quite neutral but leans warmer, smoother, and less ‘etched’ up top. That makes it great if you want something more relaxed and forgiving, but it might not scratch the itch if you prefer the clarity and energy of the 560S.
So it comes down to whether you want a more v-shaped, lively sound (XS) or a smoother, warmer take (XV). I’d lean you toward the Edition XS, since it’s more affordable right now.
These graph very similar to the Susvara – do you find any similarities between the two subjectively?
Haha yeah they do look similar on a quick glance. Subjectively they both share that typical Hifiman house sound in how the mids are presented. That said, once you zoom in, the differences remain pretty significant. Across the bass through lower mids the Edition XV is consistently about 1-2 dB more elevated, which makes it sound fuller and more forward. Then in the upper treble the Susvara sits 5 dB or more higher in spots. It’s brighter, airier and more extended compared to XV’s more restrained top end. So while they share some DNA (and both well-tuned), they don’t sound that similar outside of that general Hifiman midrange character.
Hi Sai, I love and appreciate your site and work! I’m reposting an inquiry I also posted on headfi and would love to hear your thoughts.
I currently only own dynamic open backs. The hd600, 6xx and 660s2. The AT R70x refine, R70xa and the Sony MDR-MV1. At least two too many and probably some redundancy there I know, but I’ve got the madness. I like all of them but am looking to pick up one (hopefully just one) planar at or under 500 bucks. The only planar I’ve previously owned or heard is the Audeze Maxwell which I liked but found out I can’t do closed backs so I got rid of them. I don’t necessarily have a favorite of the headphones I own. That can change on any given day based on what’s currently on my head and what I’m listening to. I also don’t necessarily have a sound signature preference though any strong sibilance definitely throws me off. I enjoy warm but can also tolerate some treble. The only headphone I have that I routinely eq is the MV1 and that’s a -2.0db high shelf at around 6k. Though I’ve also gotten pretty accustomed to the stock tuning and the treble peaks don’t particularly bother me on the MV1 with most stuff. I think that’s due to the relative balance created by that headphone’s substantial bass boost though. Long story short, owning no other planar and having never even heard another Hifiman model, do you think the Edition XV would be a good planar to get? Better than say, the Edition XS, Arya Stealth or the FT1 Pro or Para/Para 2? Out of the models you may have heard of course. Does it have a level of warmth that makes it more niche or would you recommend it as a solid option for your one and only all rounder planar?
Thank you and keep it up! You’re great.
Thanks for the kind words!
Given your preferences and the fact that you’ve never owned a Hifiman before (and want just one good all-rounder planar under $500), the Edition XV is a solid contender.
It has a warmer, smoother presentation than typical Hifiman offerings, which makes it forgiving with sibilance and easy to enjoy for long sessions. It’s not so warm that it becomes overly niche, but it does trade a bit of top-end sparkle and air for that smoothness. For a ‘one and done’ planar that doesn’t demand EQ, the XV has enough balance to handle most music well, a comfort profile that should work for long listening. The FT1 Pro is more of an “orthodox” sound profile not as spacious or liquid as the XV, and the Para/Para 2 lean cleaner and more analytical. If you value absolute technical performance over ease of listening, Arya Stealth might still tempt you, but for your described preferences, the XV seems like a sweet spot especially since you’re used to slightly warmer sounding dynamic headphones as those you listed.
Thank you!
Great job Sai! One of the first reviews and measurements of edition xv. Hifiman scared the shit outta me for making a headphone this smooth at this price point. ♪(^∇^*)
Yep, it caught me off guard too!
Yes, I am willing to compromise on stage width in order to gain a more precise image.
So, Cosmo has the precise imaging compared to the HEK Stealth after all. This was my main concern regarding the Cosmo.
However, compromise on the low end heft is more difficult. Haha! But, as you said, if the Cosmo can handle intense passages the same or even better as HEK Stealth, I’m willing to compromise on bass heft, too.
So many compromises. Haha!
I didn’t know about Moondrop’s conference. It’s just few days from now. Thank you for informing of it. I’ll wait for it to see if we get any Cosmo 2 news.
In the end, my ultimate concerns with the Cosmo were imaging precision and control in intense complex passages compared to the HE1000 Stealth. So, by going the Cosmo route, I’m not sacrificing anything in these vital aspects. As much as it’s a tough one, but I’m willing to make the compromise on bass quantity in order to gain the acurate imaging and competency in intense/complex passages.
Thank you. I have no way of giving any of these headphones a listen prior to purchase, and it’s an extremely difficult task to make a decision on such things when you haven’t heard them, especially when we consider the near grand cost of these headphones. So, your counsel – valuable experience coming from discerning ears in combination with your honesty – not only has been of outmost importance, but also a great kindness to this stranger. Thank you dearly, Sai.
Yeah, if your top priorities are imaging precision and control during complex passages, the Cosmo stands shoulder to shoulder with the HE1000 Stealth in those areas. The trade-off is in bass dynamics, but those key things you value stay intact. There’s no perfect headphone, just the right compromises for you.
I’m a bit sceptical about a new TOTL model, but I can hope!
I’m glad my impressions have helped you cut through the guesswork. That’s exactly why I do what I do here. : )
Hey there Sai, thanks a ton for the early review and measurements!
I bought the Ananda Nano a few months ago, and while I do like how they sound, comfort has been a bit of an issue for me due to the lack of cup swivel.
Considering the XV and the Nano are similarly priced, I wanted to know how the XV compares to the Nano in terms of technical performance and especially soundstage. Frequency response wise, I think I will probably prefer the Nano’s overall brighter sound, but due to the comfort issue am strongly considering selling them and buying the XV.
Really just depends on whether that would be a downgrade in terms of sound quality, outside of just the frequency response.
No worries! I’d say the Ananda Nano edges out the Edition XV in the way most people perceive technicalities. It’s more focused on clarity, detail, and has a more dynamic, snappy character. The Nano also stages wide with good air and openness.
The XV feels different: more relaxed, warmer, smoother, and less forward in the upper ranges. Soundstage is still good, but not as expansive or airy as the Nano. It’s more about coherence and tonal balance than hyper-clarity.
If you listen very loud, the Nano can get a bit rough due to its higher harmonic distortion at elevated SPLs. So while they’re both strong in their own ways, it’s really an apples-to-oranges situation. Nano for clarity and scale, XV for a smoother, more tonally easy-going listen.
Thanks a lot for the clarification Sai! Your measurements have been invaluable for making custom EQ profiles for my Nano, keep up the great work!
I guess I’ll be sticking with my Nano then, as I use these for mixing and mastering music and the perceived soundstage and clarity is important for mixing down the treble on a lot of tracks.
Seeing this new and improved headband design, I just wish Hifiman had moved to this much earlier on. Would have made the Nano pretty much perfect for me.
Today is the 15th of August – the day of Moondrop’s press conference. The main reason that I’m waiting for some news on a supposedly prospective Cosmo 2 is because I think they may have fine-tuned its bass a little bit compared to the OG Cosmo. My guess derives from the fact that they have fine-tuned the bass on thier planars with each iteration like on Para 2 compared to OG Para. As much as I care about build quality, at this stage, build improvements (like stainless steel) would be just added bonus.
Don’t know where we’d see a report of this press conference, though. I’ve been keeping a lookout on the Reddit and Head-Fi for it. Haha!
Incidentally, I’ve read a good number of people talking about amplification issues with the Cosmo. They say that it’s one of the current-hungriest headphones, that it had sent their amps into protection mode, that it only sounds good when driven probably by a very capable amp. I have an Aune S9C Pro as my main and only dac/amp – its specifications read as 5500mW per 32 Ohms and 672mW per 300 Ohms on its balanced outputs. Is the S9C Pro capable to properly and cleanly drive the Comso without any issue?
Thanks. Plain and simple, you and your through website have been a godsend in my search.
Take care, dear Sai.
Hey, no worries. Quick recap for you. Moondrop’s press conference had a few surprises. Alongside some new IEMs and TWS releases, they have a CNY 4999 planar with a 0.5 um silver circuit and “unveiled” back grille (essentially a new Cosmo). Interestingly, the stock pads look very similar to, if not exactly, the EP100A. Sales start 16th Aug. They also announced a true TOTL model at CNY 19999 with a gold circuit and carbon-fibre chassis. No detailed notes on that one yet afaik.
On the amp side, that’s technically right. Moondrop planars tend to have low impedance so they are current-hungry. I don’t have any experiences with the S9C Pro, but seems like it puts out plenty on paper, so unless you listen very loud or push huge EQ boosts, it should handle the Cosmo without trouble. If you want peace of mind, I suggest checking with other S9C Pro owners running low-impedance planars.
Awesome review as always! Any plans to review the HE600?
Yep. As an HE6 OG owner, I am very interested in those. 😉
nice! looking forward to it!
I have always loved your reviews, but now I love their recent “transience speed” too. Haha!
I won’t consider Cosmo anymore mainly due to 2 reasons (firstly its lack of bass, and secondly its Imaging compared to the other options).
The most important reason for prioritizing perceived technicalities over perceived tonality by forgoing Cosmo and its respective tunings with its stock and EP100A pads and instead opting to choose among egg-shaped Hifimans is because almost 80-85 percent of my music listening is made of instrumental tracks (soundtracks, classical, neo-classical, and electronic). Later on, I’d get one of the Senn HD600-seires for their tonality and my vocal genres.
However, if Cosmo 2 came along with a bass more tuned like diffuse field instead of raw field and with a better build like Para 2 (stainless steel! Haha!), that would seem like perfection and a good compromise, but at the moment Comso 1 is no longer a holistic option for me. So, I’ve put the HE1000 Stealth on the map once again.
In my extensive readings on these headphones, I’ve come to learn that more people seem to enjoy the tuning/tonality of HE10000 Stealth compared to Arya Stealth and Organic, but, among these, which one is the better/best in terms of perceived technicalities alone – with the following order of importance – overall resolution of the whole frequency response; acurate or “pinpoint” imgaing, staging, and layering; and, lastly dynamics?
I especially appreciate knowing which one handles tracks with intense passages more gracefully – hoping to not experience any muddiness or congestion, especially in the bass region?
Among the HE1000 Stealth, Arya Stealth, and Organic, I’ll aim and get the one that matches the above technicalities the most.
After years of reading and watching reviews and comparisons on headphones, you have simply become my primary source. Haha! So, dear Sai, I’d like to thank you, your experience, and counsul one more time.
Hey mate, I appreciate thatm, and it’s great to hear you’ve found my advice useful.
Yeah, if they ever release a Cosmo 2 with a stainless steel build that would be pretty exciting. No word yet if that’s in the works, though. There have been rumours about Moondrop working on a new flagship over-ear, but that might just be the estat model they’ve been developing since… what, 2021?
Bottom line, I still think the Cosmo is an excellent headphone. If you can find one used or on sale for a good price, it’s worth picking up. Making purchase decisions based on your most listened-to genres is definitely a good approach, and for the ones you’ve mentioned, both Hifiman and Moondrop have strong options.
For the Hifiman side, I think the HE1000 Stealth is the most balanced and smooth-sounding of the traditional eggy series. In terms of perceived technicalities, it’s about on par with the Arya Organic. The Organic is very strong in that area but tonally bright, with a somewhat lean midrange. I personally prefer even the HE1000se over the Arya Organic, but the Organic is still impressive – grand, open, fast, and resolving. It’s one of the tech standouts in the egg-shaped lineup.
That said, like the Ananda Nano, the Arya Organic can show increased distortion at higher SPLs above ~90 dB. So I only recommend it to people chasing technicalities or that “wow” factor who also listen at moderate volumes. For your needs, especially since you want something that handles intense tracks gracefully, the HE1000 Stealth is a safer bet. It stays controlled without congestion or muddiness.
One other model worth mentioning is the Arya Unveiled. It’s not on your list, but it could be a good alternative, one with a pleasant tone similar to the HE1000 Stealth (arguably better in the mids) with technical performance similar to it. My review of the Arya Unveiled is coming up soon, by the way. If you get the chance, it’s worth a listen. Being a newer model it’s still a bit pricier, but a sale could pop up.
Dear Sai, thank you.
So, among egg-shaped Hifimans, it is the HE1000 Stealth. BTW, not only can’t I afford the unveiled models at the moment, I’m afraid of their ownership, as well. Haha!
There’s another reason as to why I’m staying with classical egg-shapes, too: it’s because they, unlike the unveiled models, have the 2K dip which helps with the sense of grand staging. Although, I’d like a bigger stage for my instrumental music, but I don’t want to sacrifice accurate imaging for it.
Your praise of Cosmo truly makes me consider it alongside the HE1000 Stealth, I’m only afraid it might not have a accurate/precise imaging compared to the HEK Stealth. I also don’t know how the Cosmo handles the intense passages, especially in the bass range, compared to the HEK Stealth.
If Cosmo is on par with the HEK Stealth for both pinpoint imaging and competent handling of intense passages, I don’t mind getting the Cosmo instead of HE1000 Stealth at all.
it’s just that I’ve been thinking that, compared to the Cosmo, I might get the more accurate imaging and competent bass (in handling busy passages) with the HE1000 Stealth.
In fact, if they are equal in these two aspects, I’d like to go with the Cosmo, because I can procure the EP100A pads for it easier and cheaper than getting a official set of pads for Hifimans.
Glad to help. Yes, among the traditional egg-shaped Hifimans, the HE1000 Stealth is my pick for a balanced and even sound unless you’re aiming for the latest Unveiled series.
On imaging, the Cosmo is actually very close to the HE1000 Stealth and can feel more precise in some cases. It doesn’t have the same expansiveness, but its definition is excellent. The HE1000 Stealth presents a more diffused, larger stage, while the Cosmo renders a more focused, grounded image.
Both handle busy passages well. The Cosmo’s main trade-off is bass weight: it’s leaner, with great nuance but less macro punch than the HE1000 Stealth.
If you value imaging precision and control in complex tracks, the Cosmo is still a strong choice. You’d trade some low-end heft for easier pad options and a tight, accurate presentation. At the right price, it’s compelling. But as you noted, Moondrop’s build quality improvements in the Para 2 give some hope for what might come next. Also, Moondrop is having a press conference on 15th August, so it may be worth waiting to see what they announce.
Thanks Sai!
This Edition XV looks very promising.
Glad to see you again! It’s definitely an interesting one and has a lot going for it, especially for the price.
Arya Unveiled review coming soon? 👀
Yep that one’s coming up soon!
Glad to see this post on August 9.
I consider buying a used focal clear OG for €490 in FR, but is this Hifiman can beat the focal for the overall Product ?
Pretty curious on how it compares to the Arya Stealth. That’s also a little slower and looser sounding and it probably has more stage.
The Arya Stealth is still the more technical headphone overall, but the tuning is so different that it’s a bit like comparing apples to oranges. If you’re fine with some treble brightness or don’t mind EQ, and you’re okay paying a bit more, the Arya Stealth is still the stronger performer as a whole. The XV, by contrast, is more compelling as a smooth, effortless listen at a lower price.
Haha I was curious enough to grab a pair from China when they released early. Clear OG at €490 is a solid deal. They do very different things though. Both lean warm, but I wouldn’t call the XV outright better or worse. The Clear is still my go-to for dynamic, punchy bass in this range, especially for pop and rock. The XV feels a bit more refined up top (not something I usually say about a lot of older Hifiman models) and has that planar bass extension with a softer, euphonic quality. At the same price, I’d personally pick the Clear OG, but with the price gap, it depends on what sound you’re after.
I like it a lot. Finally treble that wont murder my ears.
Yeah I think a lot of people would enjoy this tuning, me included. It works well across a wider range of genres, unless you’re really not into warm-tilted sound.
Thanks for the review, Gigachad!
Haha cheers! Glad you enjoyed the review.
Between Edition XV and FIIO FT1 ,what will be your pick? Or they are very different beasts ? Complementary?
Hey Claudio, did you mean the FT1 or the FT1 Pro? If you meant the Pro, it’s a fairer comparison since both are planar, but they still have different priorities. I’d pick the Edition XV for a bigger, smoother, more ‘liquid’ presentation and a more premium look. That said, the FT1 Pro costs less, is a bit more comfortable for some, and has easier pad-swapping options.
If you meant the FT1, then they’re really quite different beasts altogether in design, and tuning, so it’s more about which fits your needs. So I’d say they are complementary.