Hifiman Edition XV review: not quite the XS successor, but in a good way?

~ sai

Intro:

Hifiman has been known for a characteristic tuning that can be divisive at times. Treble‑sensitive listeners often find some of the brand’s planar headphones a bit bright. This has been especially true for parts of the “Stealth” model era, where certain models carried extra upper‑treble energy.

When the Edition XS launched in 2021, I was excited by the value it offered, and it went on to become one of the brand’s most talked-about models. Now we have the new Edition XV, officially positioned as its successor. It features an updated headband with improved ergonomics and a sleeker aesthetic. Hifiman also claims the diaphragm is “60% thinner” than that of the XS and that the magnets have been revised to use “rare-earth-free materials”.

But does the Edition XV really follow the XS in sound? Let’s dive in.

For those who want to jump right into detailed measurements, check out the final section of this article.

Disclaimer: This unit was purchased for testing and review purposes.

Specs & Comfort

Price: $399 USD / $749 AUD
Driver size: 130*95 mm (frame); 80*50 mm (effective)
Driver type: Planar Magnetic
Sensitivity: 92 dB/mW @1kHz
Impedance: 13 Ω at 1kHz
Connector: dual 3.5 mm TRS
Weight: 453 grams (excl. cable)
Clamping force: medium
Comfort: 6.5/10 (slightly weighty; tiny bit clampy)

As shown in the last photo, the new headband now has cup swivel. The range is somewhat limited though (around 10 to 15 degrees) but it still improves fit and comfort compared to previous designs.

Measurement & Sound

For more comparisons, visit my squiglink database.

Tonal balance:

Overall, the Edition XV sounds smooth, liquid, and full-bodied — probably not what I would call the typical Hifiman sound signature. My first impression was simply that, wow, this is unusually smooth, almost reminiscent of a Meze planar or even a Sennheiser, particularly in the treble balance.

Bass
The Edition XV’s bass is flat and linear in the planar tradition, but slightly elevated as a whole. It leans toward the thick, meaty side rather than the leaner, tighter character found in many other Hifiman models. In that way, it reminds me somewhat of Audeze’s approach, though not quite as dense or tactile.

Compared to models like the Ananda Stealth or Arya Organic, which exemplify tight, punchy bass, the XV takes a different path. The bass has a slightly looser, more relaxed quality, though it still reaches effortlessly down to 20 Hz. In terms of quantity, it delivers a satisfying, robust foundation that supports the rest of the spectrum. Fundamentals feel rich and full-bodied, giving music extra note weight without sounding bloated.


Midrange
The mids on the Edition XV are smooth yet remaining articulate. Looking at the relationship between midrange fundamentals and harmonics, the XV reverses the style found in many earlier Hifiman planars. Here, the midrange fundamentals are slightly elevated while harmonics are gently toned down — both shifts are modest (around 1.5-2 dB), but together they create a noticeably fuller, more polished presentation compared to its predecessor, the Edition XS.

As a result, vocals and instruments carry more body and warmth. Listeners who found older Hifiman tunings too “analytical” may find this easier on the ear. That said, the classic “Hifiman dip” in the 1-2 kHz region is still present, which pushes vocals and some midrange instruments a bit further back in the mix. A milder dip could bring more liveliness and presence, but even so, the XV still handles vocal-centric genres like country and pop with ease and enjoyment.


Treble
The Edition XV continues the smooth, almost lush tuning into the treble. Gone is the spicy, sometimes edgy treble of earlier models like the Edition XS or Arya Organic. Instead, the XV delivers a top end that almost reminds me of the Sennheiser HD6X0 series, with its very linear, refined rise and a gentle, natural roll-off beyond about 5 kHz.

This is immediately visible in measurements, but also clear in listening. Cymbals sound clean and well-shaped without splashing into excessive brightness. There’s no hint of harsh vocal sibilance, and upper treble energy is carefully controlled — more in line with something like the FiiO FT1 Pro than traditional Hifiman planars. As a result, the XV trades some of the brand’s trademark air and brilliance for a softer, more forgiving presentation.

While this tuning broadens its appeal to listeners who prefer an easygoing treble, it may leave some long-time Hifiman fans wanting more treble detail and sparkle. This is a classic example of the trade-off between tonal balance and perceived technical performance — in many cases, what listeners interpret as “resolution” is the product of targeted treble energy rather than a true increase in driver capability.

As a whole, this is why I find it odd that Hifiman markets the XV as a successor to the Edition XS — the two follow very different tuning directions. In fact, the XV is much closer in character to the Edition X V2, a headphone often remembered as the smooth, mellow outlier of the egg-shaped family and one that developed a loyal following for exactly that reason. Interestingly, my measurement align closely with Hangout Audio’s measurements of the Edition X V2 (both on the GRAS 43AG platform, coupler differences aside). So in many ways, the XV feels less like an XS sequel and more like a modern update of that Edition X V2 sound.

credit: Hangout Audio, an excellent online audio store worth checking out! (Disclaimer: not a paid promotion)

Other qualities:

  • Soundstage
    The Edition XV’s soundstage is competent but not especially expansive. It doesn’t have quite the same sense of width or openness that some of the egg-shaped Hifiman models are known for. That said, it avoids sounding closed-in or claustrophobic, maintaining a generally natural spatial impression when the music calls for it.

    Imaging is a touch softer and more diffuse than I’ve heard from other models in this family as well. Instead of sharply etched positional cues, the XV leans toward a more blended, though cohesive presentation. This works well for relaxed listening but sacrifices a bit of the pinpoint accuracy that some listeners seek for gaming or complex orchestral work.

    Where the XV works well is in depth projection. Layering between front-to-back elements is handled naturally, with a convincing sense of distance and separation between instruments. While not a stage-width champion, it offers a comfortable and immersive space that works well across most genres.
  • Clarity
    Clarity on the Edition XV is good for its price bracket, though it doesn’t quite push into the higher tiers among planars. Its tonal balance is generally linear across the spectrum, so you don’t feel like any frequency range is missing.

    That said, in this case the upper-midrange dip has a noticeable impact on perceived resolution. Because that 1-2 kHz region is slightly recessed and the midrange fundamentals are fuller, the presentation is smoother but also less revealing. Micro-details in vocals or the fine texture of strings don’t stand out quite as much as they do on a more forward-tuned headphones. It’s often a trade-off between tonal balance and what’s perceived as technical performance — much of which is shaped by frequency-response quirks and, to a lesser extent, measurable factors like THD and driver matching.

    In practice, I would rank the XV’s clarity significantly higher than the Sennheiser HD6XX, slightly above the FiiO FT1 Pro, but behind the Ananda Stealth. It strikes a nice balance between detail and fatigue-free listening, but it’s not chasing pure analytical performance.
  • Dynamics
    Dynamics on the Edition XV are decent, but not class-leading. In terms of microdynamics — small-scale shifts and nuances in quieter passages — it outperforms most dynamic-driver headphones in its price range. Subtle changes in vocal expression, the decay of piano notes, or the gentle rise of a cymbal swell are rendered with a sense of gradation rather than feeling flat. Compared to other planars, however, it’s not as finely shaded as models like the Moondrop Para 2 or the Ananda Stealth. In very busy passages, the presentation can blur slightly, with finer details losing some definition.

    On the other hand, macrodynamics — slam, impact, and large-scale swings — are satisfying. The XV has no signs of compression even when pushed to high levels around 100 dB, which speaks to the driver’s excursion capabilities. When the music calls for big bass drops or dramatic hits, it delivers with authority and weight.

Conclusion and value:

At $399 USD/ $749 AUD, the Hifiman Edition XV offers a sound that is both easy to enjoy and largely balanced straight out of the box. Its tonal profile stands apart from much of Hifiman’s recent lineup, harking back to the smoother, fuller presentation of the Edition X V2 rather than following the brighter, more analytical path of the Edition XS. For listners who have found past Hifiman models a bit too sharp in the treble or lean in the mids, the XV will likely be a welcome change.

Does the new XV edge out the XS? Not necessarily. The Edition XS remains relevant, and even highly competitive, thanks to its different tuning and its current aggressive price of around $239 USD.

I’m glad to see Hifiman broadening its tuning range. The XV’s sound profile could appeal to a wider audience, especially those coming from dynamic headphones who want to explore planars without the fatigue that sometimes comes with extra treble energy. The updated headband, with its added cup swivel, improves comfort and fit, and the new silver finish gives it a modern, more premium look compared to the XS.

In short, the Edition XV is not a direct sonic successor to the Edition XS, but a different flavour within the egg-shaped family — one that blends smoothness, warmth, and enough technical ability to stay competitive in its class. It’s a reminder that technical performance isn’t always about chasing every last detail — sometimes the right tonal balance delivers a more enjoyable listening experience.

If there are specific comparisons with other headphones you would like to see, let me know in the comments.

PROS:
+ Smooth, fatigue-free tuning across the spectrum
+ Full-bodied bass with linear extension
+ Decent depth and layering
+ Comfortable updated headband with swivel cups

CONS:
– Less sparkle than typical Hifiman tuning
– Soundstage width only average
– Slightly recessed upper mids affect clarity
– Imaging less precise than some competitors

Value Grade:

Rating: 8.5 out of 10.

Earpads and EQ

A quick heads-up on the earpads: the Edition XV, like other recent egg-shaped models since the Unveiled series, uses redesigned plastic mounting clips on the back. This means pads from older Hifiman models won’t fit. At the time of writing, there are no aftermarket options available, though hopefully that will change soon.

In terms of EQ, this headphone requires little adjustments to sound well-balanced. That said, there’s still room for fine-tuning.

The main direction here would be to give the treble a slight lift for clarity, while tightening the bass response and adding a bit more punch.

My EQ setting for this headphone (adjust first and last filters to taste):

Preamp: -4.0 dB
Filter 1: ON PK Fc 30 Hz Gain 4.0 dB Q 0.500
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 170 Hz Gain -2.5 dB Q 2.000
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 400 Hz Gain -1.0 dB Q 2.500
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 700 Hz Gain -1.5 dB Q 1.500
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1700 Hz Gain 3.0 dB Q 1.600
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 16500 Hz Gain 3.0 dB Q 1.000

If your goal is to EQ the response to match the Harman Target, consider the AutoEQ function provided by Squiglink as a convenient starting point. I personally recommend customising the filters to better suit your own hearing, especially in the treble. While the AutoEQ provides a useful baseline, individual adjustments can often significantly improve your listening experience.

If you’re new to EQ, I’d recommend checking out this video by Resolve from The Headphone Show — it’s a really solid intro and walks through the basics in a clear, no-nonsense way. Great place to start!

MEASUREMENTS

Frequency Response:

The response is obtained by an average of 5-6 positional variations. The FR shown on the graph is unsmoothed.

Positional Variation:

This graph illustrates how headphone placement on the head affects perceived tonal balance: with the ear positioned at the front (blue), centre (purple), and back (red) of the headphone. The FRs shown on the graph are 1/48 octave smoothed.

Leakage Tolerance:

This graph demonstrates how leakages to the front volume can result in FR change: blue (good seal), purple (thin arm glasses), red (thick arm glasses). The FR shown on the graph is 1/12 octave smoothed.

Comment: Like most open-back planars, this headphone can show a slight bass boost when the seal is compromised. This is partly due to its large driver size and relatively low diaphragm tension.

Linearity and Dynamic Compression:

Linearity and dynamic compression testing plots the headphone’s frequency response at two input levels to show how it reproduces signals as loudness changes. Any divergence between the high-level and low-level curves points to where the transducer’s dynamic range begins to compress or distort. Here, the measurements are superimposed to allow direct comparison.

Comment: This is excellent result. There’re no signs of compression at high SPLs.

Impulse Response:

The impulse response test measures the initial response, overshoot, and decay of a transducer upon receiving a signal. An initial upshoot indicates a normal polarity, vice versa.

HpTF Variations:

Headphone Transfer Function (HpTF) describes how sound is shaped by headphone design and ear anatomy before reaching the eardrum. Different measurement rigs (with varying pinnae designs) introduce unique reponses/resonances and potential deviations from actual human perception. Understanding HpTF helps translate measured data into real-world listening experiences.

Total Harmonic Distortion (THD% 2nd-9th) & Excess Group Delay (94 dB):

These measurements are conducted in quiet, normal room conditions (as opposed to an anechoic chamber), meaning there may be some influence from ambient room and external noise. These results should be considered a preliminary assessment of performance, primarily for identifying major issues, and do not reflect the best-case performance scenario.

Comment: 94dB distortion levels are slightly higher than ideal in 1.5kHz to 6kHz range are slightly higher than ideal. However, they should remain largely inaudible under normal listening conditions.

Channel Matching:

Channel matching graphs are intended for quality control checks and do not relate to the perceived sound profile. A specialised configuration is used in this test to capture differences between channels, mitigating interference from positioning on the rig and the asymmetry in the GRAS pinnae design, a legacy of KEMAR. The left (blue) and right (red) channels are measured using a flat plate coupler with an IEC60318-4 ear simulator.

Comment: Channel matching on this particular unit is good, which may contribute to imaging precision and the clarity of spatial cues. The slight “wobble” in the mids is likely due to modal response of large planar drivers, which can vary between measurements or under different conditions.

Electric Phase & Impedance:

The above graph shows the measured impedance (green) and electric phase (grey), measured under free-air condition (minimal front volume coupling).

Comment: This headphone’s impedance curve is typical of a planar headphone – flat and low.

END OF THE ARTICLE

Disclaimer: This review is independent and was not sponsored or endorsed by any company or affiliated entity. All headphones reviewed are purchased for review unless otherwise stated. Any links or product references are provided for informational purposes only and are not associated with any financial compensation or affiliate arrangement.

98 thoughts on “Hifiman Edition XV review: not quite the XS successor, but in a good way?”

    1. Yeah I think a lot of people would enjoy this tuning, me included. It works well across a wider range of genres, unless you’re really not into warm-tilted sound.

      Like

      Reply

    3. Between Edition XV and FIIO FT1 ,what will be your pick? Or they are very different beasts ? Complementary?

      Like

      Reply

      1. Hey Claudio, did you mean the FT1 or the FT1 Pro? If you meant the Pro, it’s a fairer comparison since both are planar, but they still have different priorities. I’d pick the Edition XV for a bigger, smoother, more ‘liquid’ presentation and a more premium look. That said, the FT1 Pro costs less, is a bit more comfortable for some, and has easier pad-swapping options.

        If you meant the FT1, then they’re really quite different beasts altogether in design, and tuning, so it’s more about which fits your needs. So I’d say they are complementary.

        Like

        Reply

  2. Glad to see this post on August 9.
    I consider buying a used focal clear OG for €490 in FR, but is this Hifiman can beat the focal for the overall Product ?

    Like

    Reply

    1. Pretty curious on how it compares to the Arya Stealth. That’s also a little slower and looser sounding and it probably has more stage.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

    2. The Arya Stealth is still the more technical headphone overall, but the tuning is so different that it’s a bit like comparing apples to oranges. If you’re fine with some treble brightness or don’t mind EQ, and you’re okay paying a bit more, the Arya Stealth is still the stronger performer as a whole. The XV, by contrast, is more compelling as a smooth, effortless listen at a lower price.

      Like

      Reply

    3. Haha I was curious enough to grab a pair from China when they released early. Clear OG at €490 is a solid deal. They do very different things though. Both lean warm, but I wouldn’t call the XV outright better or worse. The Clear is still my go-to for dynamic, punchy bass in this range, especially for pop and rock. The XV feels a bit more refined up top (not something I usually say about a lot of older Hifiman models) and has that planar bass extension with a softer, euphonic quality. At the same price, I’d personally pick the Clear OG, but with the price gap, it depends on what sound you’re after.

      Like

      Reply

  5. I have always loved your reviews, but now I love their recent “transience speed” too. Haha!

    I won’t consider Cosmo anymore mainly due to 2 reasons (firstly its lack of bass, and secondly its Imaging compared to the other options).

    The most important reason for prioritizing perceived technicalities over perceived tonality by forgoing Cosmo and its respective tunings with its stock and EP100A pads and instead opting to choose among egg-shaped Hifimans is because almost 80-85 percent of my music listening is made of instrumental tracks (soundtracks, classical, neo-classical, and electronic). Later on, I’d get one of the Senn HD600-seires for their tonality and my vocal genres.

    However, if Cosmo 2 came along with a bass more tuned like diffuse field instead of raw field and with a better build like Para 2 (stainless steel! Haha!), that would seem like perfection and a good compromise, but at the moment Comso 1 is no longer a holistic option for me. So, I’ve put the HE1000 Stealth on the map once again.

    In my extensive readings on these headphones, I’ve come to learn that more people seem to enjoy the tuning/tonality of HE10000 Stealth compared to Arya Stealth and Organic, but, among these, which one is the better/best in terms of perceived technicalities alone – with the following order of importance – overall resolution of the whole frequency response; acurate or “pinpoint” imgaing, staging, and layering; and, lastly dynamics?

    I especially appreciate knowing which one handles tracks with intense passages more gracefully – hoping to not experience any muddiness or congestion, especially in the bass region?

    Among the HE1000 Stealth, Arya Stealth, and Organic, I’ll aim and get the one that matches the above technicalities the most.

    After years of reading and watching reviews and comparisons on headphones, you have simply become my primary source. Haha! So, dear Sai, I’d like to thank you, your experience, and counsul one more time.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hey mate, I appreciate thatm, and it’s great to hear you’ve found my advice useful.

      Yeah, if they ever release a Cosmo 2 with a stainless steel build that would be pretty exciting. No word yet if that’s in the works, though. There have been rumours about Moondrop working on a new flagship over-ear, but that might just be the estat model they’ve been developing since… what, 2021?

      Bottom line, I still think the Cosmo is an excellent headphone. If you can find one used or on sale for a good price, it’s worth picking up. Making purchase decisions based on your most listened-to genres is definitely a good approach, and for the ones you’ve mentioned, both Hifiman and Moondrop have strong options.

      For the Hifiman side, I think the HE1000 Stealth is the most balanced and smooth-sounding of the traditional eggy series. In terms of perceived technicalities, it’s about on par with the Arya Organic. The Organic is very strong in that area but tonally bright, with a somewhat lean midrange. I personally prefer even the HE1000se over the Arya Organic, but the Organic is still impressive – grand, open, fast, and resolving. It’s one of the tech standouts in the egg-shaped lineup.

      That said, like the Ananda Nano, the Arya Organic can show increased distortion at higher SPLs above ~90 dB. So I only recommend it to people chasing technicalities or that “wow” factor who also listen at moderate volumes. For your needs, especially since you want something that handles intense tracks gracefully, the HE1000 Stealth is a safer bet. It stays controlled without congestion or muddiness.

      One other model worth mentioning is the Arya Unveiled. It’s not on your list, but it could be a good alternative, one with a pleasant tone similar to the HE1000 Stealth (arguably better in the mids) with technical performance similar to it. My review of the Arya Unveiled is coming up soon, by the way. If you get the chance, it’s worth a listen. Being a newer model it’s still a bit pricier, but a sale could pop up.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Dear Sai, thank you.

        So, among egg-shaped Hifimans, it is the HE1000 Stealth. BTW, not only can’t I afford the unveiled models at the moment, I’m afraid of their ownership, as well. Haha!

        There’s another reason as to why I’m staying with classical egg-shapes, too: it’s because they, unlike the unveiled models, have the 2K dip which helps with the sense of grand staging. Although, I’d like a bigger stage for my instrumental music, but I don’t want to sacrifice accurate imaging for it.

        Your praise of Cosmo truly makes me consider it alongside the HE1000 Stealth, I’m only afraid it might not have a accurate/precise imaging compared to the HEK Stealth. I also don’t know how the Cosmo handles the intense passages, especially in the bass range, compared to the HEK Stealth.

        If Cosmo is on par with the HEK Stealth for both pinpoint imaging and competent handling of intense passages, I don’t mind getting the Cosmo instead of HE1000 Stealth at all.

        it’s just that I’ve been thinking that, compared to the Cosmo, I might get the more accurate imaging and competent bass (in handling busy passages) with the HE1000 Stealth.
        In fact, if they are equal in these two aspects, I’d like to go with the Cosmo, because I can procure the EP100A pads for it easier and cheaper than getting a official set of pads for Hifimans.

        Like

        Reply

        1. Glad to help. Yes, among the traditional egg-shaped Hifimans, the HE1000 Stealth is my pick for a balanced and even sound unless you’re aiming for the latest Unveiled series.

          On imaging, the Cosmo is actually very close to the HE1000 Stealth and can feel more precise in some cases. It doesn’t have the same expansiveness, but its definition is excellent. The HE1000 Stealth presents a more diffused, larger stage, while the Cosmo renders a more focused, grounded image.

          Both handle busy passages well. The Cosmo’s main trade-off is bass weight: it’s leaner, with great nuance but less macro punch than the HE1000 Stealth.

          If you value imaging precision and control in complex tracks, the Cosmo is still a strong choice. You’d trade some low-end heft for easier pad options and a tight, accurate presentation. At the right price, it’s compelling. But as you noted, Moondrop’s build quality improvements in the Para 2 give some hope for what might come next. Also, Moondrop is having a press conference on 15th August, so it may be worth waiting to see what they announce.

          Like

          Reply

  7. Yes, I am willing to compromise on stage width in order to gain a more precise image.

    So, Cosmo has the precise imaging compared to the HEK Stealth after all. This was my main concern regarding the Cosmo.

    However, compromise on the low end heft is more difficult. Haha! But, as you said, if the Cosmo can handle intense passages the same or even better as HEK Stealth, I’m willing to compromise on bass heft, too.

    So many compromises. Haha!

    I didn’t know about Moondrop’s conference. It’s just few days from now. Thank you for informing of it. I’ll wait for it to see if we get any Cosmo 2 news.

    In the end, my ultimate concerns with the Cosmo were imaging precision and control in intense complex passages compared to the HE1000 Stealth. So, by going the Cosmo route, I’m not sacrificing anything in these vital aspects. As much as it’s a tough one, but I’m willing to make the compromise on bass quantity in order to gain the acurate imaging and competency in intense/complex passages.

    Thank you. I have no way of giving any of these headphones a listen prior to purchase, and it’s an extremely difficult task to make a decision on such things when you haven’t heard them, especially when we consider the near grand cost of these headphones. So, your counsel – valuable experience coming from discerning ears in combination with your honesty – not only has been of outmost importance, but also a great kindness to this stranger. Thank you dearly, Sai.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Yeah, if your top priorities are imaging precision and control during complex passages, the Cosmo stands shoulder to shoulder with the HE1000 Stealth in those areas. The trade-off is in bass dynamics, but those key things you value stay intact. There’s no perfect headphone, just the right compromises for you.

      I’m a bit sceptical about a new TOTL model, but I can hope!

      I’m glad my impressions have helped you cut through the guesswork. That’s exactly why I do what I do here. : )

      Like

      Reply

      1. Hey there Sai, thanks a ton for the early review and measurements!

        I bought the Ananda Nano a few months ago, and while I do like how they sound, comfort has been a bit of an issue for me due to the lack of cup swivel.

        Considering the XV and the Nano are similarly priced, I wanted to know how the XV compares to the Nano in terms of technical performance and especially soundstage. Frequency response wise, I think I will probably prefer the Nano’s overall brighter sound, but due to the comfort issue am strongly considering selling them and buying the XV.

        Really just depends on whether that would be a downgrade in terms of sound quality, outside of just the frequency response.

        Like

        Reply

        1. No worries! I’d say the Ananda Nano edges out the Edition XV in the way most people perceive technicalities. It’s more focused on clarity, detail, and has a more dynamic, snappy character. The Nano also stages wide with good air and openness.

          The XV feels different: more relaxed, warmer, smoother, and less forward in the upper ranges. Soundstage is still good, but not as expansive or airy as the Nano. It’s more about coherence and tonal balance than hyper-clarity.

          If you listen very loud, the Nano can get a bit rough due to its higher harmonic distortion at elevated SPLs. So while they’re both strong in their own ways, it’s really an apples-to-oranges situation. Nano for clarity and scale, XV for a smoother, more tonally easy-going listen.

          Like

          Reply

          1. Thanks a lot for the clarification Sai! Your measurements have been invaluable for making custom EQ profiles for my Nano, keep up the great work!

            I guess I’ll be sticking with my Nano then, as I use these for mixing and mastering music and the perceived soundstage and clarity is important for mixing down the treble on a lot of tracks.

            Seeing this new and improved headband design, I just wish Hifiman had moved to this much earlier on. Would have made the Nano pretty much perfect for me.

            Liked by 1 person

            Reply

      2. Today is the 15th of August – the day of Moondrop’s press conference. The main reason that I’m waiting for some news on a supposedly prospective Cosmo 2 is because I think they may have fine-tuned its bass a little bit compared to the OG Cosmo. My guess derives from the fact that they have fine-tuned the bass on thier planars with each iteration like on Para 2 compared to OG Para. As much as I care about build quality, at this stage, build improvements (like stainless steel) would be just added bonus.

        Don’t know where we’d see a report of this press conference, though. I’ve been keeping a lookout on the Reddit and Head-Fi for it. Haha!

        Incidentally, I’ve read a good number of people talking about amplification issues with the Cosmo. They say that it’s one of the current-hungriest headphones, that it had sent their amps into protection mode, that it only sounds good when driven probably by a very capable amp. I have an Aune S9C Pro as my main and only dac/amp – its specifications read as 5500mW per 32 Ohms and 672mW per 300 Ohms on its balanced outputs. Is the S9C Pro capable to properly and cleanly drive the Comso without any issue?

        Thanks. Plain and simple, you and your through website have been a godsend in my search.

        Take care, dear Sai.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

        1. Hey, no worries. Quick recap for you. Moondrop’s press conference had a few surprises. Alongside some new IEMs and TWS releases, they have a CNY 4999 planar with a 0.5 um silver circuit and “unveiled” back grille (essentially a new Cosmo). Interestingly, the stock pads look very similar to, if not exactly, the EP100A. Sales start 16th Aug. They also announced a true TOTL model at CNY 19999 with a gold circuit and carbon-fibre chassis. No detailed notes on that one yet afaik.

          On the amp side, that’s technically right. Moondrop planars tend to have low impedance so they are current-hungry. I don’t have any experiences with the S9C Pro, but seems like it puts out plenty on paper, so unless you listen very loud or push huge EQ boosts, it should handle the Cosmo without trouble. If you want peace of mind, I suggest checking with other S9C Pro owners running low-impedance planars.

          Like

          Reply

  8. Great job Sai! One of the first reviews and measurements of edition xv. Hifiman scared the shit outta me for making a headphone this smooth at this price point. ♪(^∇^*)

    Like

    Reply

  9. Hi Sai, I love and appreciate your site and work! I’m reposting an inquiry I also posted on headfi and would love to hear your thoughts.

    I currently only own dynamic open backs. The hd600, 6xx and 660s2. The AT R70x refine, R70xa and the Sony MDR-MV1. At least two too many and probably some redundancy there I know, but I’ve got the madness. I like all of them but am looking to pick up one (hopefully just one) planar at or under 500 bucks. The only planar I’ve previously owned or heard is the Audeze Maxwell which I liked but found out I can’t do closed backs so I got rid of them. I don’t necessarily have a favorite of the headphones I own. That can change on any given day based on what’s currently on my head and what I’m listening to. I also don’t necessarily have a sound signature preference though any strong sibilance definitely throws me off. I enjoy warm but can also tolerate some treble. The only headphone I have that I routinely eq is the MV1 and that’s a -2.0db high shelf at around 6k. Though I’ve also gotten pretty accustomed to the stock tuning and the treble peaks don’t particularly bother me on the MV1 with most stuff. I think that’s due to the relative balance created by that headphone’s substantial bass boost though. Long story short, owning no other planar and having never even heard another Hifiman model, do you think the Edition XV would be a good planar to get? Better than say, the Edition XS, Arya Stealth or the FT1 Pro or Para/Para 2? Out of the models you may have heard of course. Does it have a level of warmth that makes it more niche or would you recommend it as a solid option for your one and only all rounder planar?

    Thank you and keep it up! You’re great.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Thanks for the kind words!

      Given your preferences and the fact that you’ve never owned a Hifiman before (and want just one good all-rounder planar under $500), the Edition XV is a solid contender.

      It has a warmer, smoother presentation than typical Hifiman offerings, which makes it forgiving with sibilance and easy to enjoy for long sessions. It’s not so warm that it becomes overly niche, but it does trade a bit of top-end sparkle and air for that smoothness. For a ‘one and done’ planar that doesn’t demand EQ, the XV has enough balance to handle most music well, a comfort profile that should work for long listening. The FT1 Pro is more of an “orthodox” sound profile not as spacious or liquid as the XV, and the Para/Para 2 lean cleaner and more analytical. If you value absolute technical performance over ease of listening, Arya Stealth might still tempt you, but for your described preferences, the XV seems like a sweet spot especially since you’re used to slightly warmer sounding dynamic headphones as those you listed.

      Like

      Reply

    1. Haha yeah they do look similar on a quick glance. Subjectively they both share that typical Hifiman house sound in how the mids are presented. That said, once you zoom in, the differences remain pretty significant. Across the bass through lower mids the Edition XV is consistently about 1-2 dB more elevated, which makes it sound fuller and more forward. Then in the upper treble the Susvara sits 5 dB or more higher in spots. It’s brighter, airier and more extended compared to XV’s more restrained top end. So while they share some DNA (and both well-tuned), they don’t sound that similar outside of that general Hifiman midrange character.

      Like

      Reply

  11. Hi Sai, Love your work! I was planning on buying the edition xs before these got released, can you help me decide? I absolutley adore the HD560S and hate the Meze 99 neo, What do you think i would enjoy more the XS or the XV?

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hey, glad you enjoy the reviews. Given your preferences, I tend to think the safer choice is the Edition XS. It has a more neutral-bright balance with that open, clear presentation you’re used to.

      The Edition XV is also quite neutral but leans warmer, smoother, and less ‘etched’ up top. That makes it great if you want something more relaxed and forgiving, but it might not scratch the itch if you prefer the clarity and energy of the 560S.

      So it comes down to whether you want a more v-shaped, lively sound (XS) or a smoother, warmer take (XV). I’d lean you toward the Edition XS, since it’s more affordable right now.

      Like

      Reply

  12. Thank you so much for the detailed reply! I was leaning towards the XS and you’ve made the choice easier, much appreciated!

    Like

    Reply

  14. The Moondrop Para 2, Edition XV and Ananda Nano, are now all 3 around the same price +- 350 euros. It seems that those are the 3 best headphones at that price range, from what I gathered these past days of researching. But be sure to let me know if I missed something.

    My question is the following, I have recently got myself a dac/amp fiio k11, and I’m looking to get my first pair of proper planar magnetic headphones. I have had a Sennheiser HD 58X Jubilee for 7 years now, I always just plugged it into my pc or phone headphone jack, and I love the way these headphones sound. The fact that they are “easy” to drive is why I bought those over the HD 6XX, another factor was that reviews mentioned that the HD 58X while not as clear had really nice bass which the 6XX and in general Sennheiser headphones lack. Back then and now still I mainly listen to hiphop and drum and bass and a bunch of random music, and I absolutely love how these genres sound on my HD 58X. But now that I have a proper dac/amp I am looking to acquire a pair of headphones that can make proper use of them, and from what I have found looking online people are raving about planar magnetic headphones.

    So in the price range of around 400 euros or I guess 450 dollars what would you recommend? I’m just really curious to experience planar magnetic drivers and the difference they make. Do you think I should lean into the bright planar magnetic (Hifiman) sound and get something like the Ananda Nano or Para 2? But I would of course still like for my preferred genres to sound good. And when reading the review on the XV you describe it as more warm and relaxed, and this reminded me of the way my HD 58X have always been described, you just plug them in play whatever and it sounds great. I would also be mostly using them behind my PC, listening to music, but also playing video games and watching videos, so it would also be nice if they are comfortable and not fatiguing.

    Sorry for the whole life story 😉 I am just trying to make an informed decision but this hifi/midfi space is so confusing, the pricing fluctuations and discounts from chinese websites, and it feels like every month the “new best deal in audio” is released. My HD58x have served me for 7 years and I am sure they will for many years to come, so I am looking to make a purchase with longevity again. Thanks for any help!

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. No worries mate that all makes sense. If you want a safe bet, I’d go for the Edition XV. It’s closer to your HD58X in that it has a warmer, lusher tuning, more on the conservative side, so it’s an easy step up for someone used to Senns. Hard to go wrong with it, though the clamp/fit could take a bit of adjusting if you’re coming from the 58X.

      If you want a different flavour and more of a “wow” factor, then the Edition XS or Para/Para 2 would be the way to go. They give you more impact, clarity, openness, and extension up top. None of them are hard to drive, so your K11 will be fine. I added the Edition XS to the list given that it is being discounted quite heavily nowadays and offer excellent value for money.

      Since the HD58X leans warm but not really dark, I think you’d actually be comfortable with either path: the XV for familiarity and smoothness, or the Edition XS/Para/Para 2 if you’re curious about the more typical planar sound. If I were you, I would probably go for the Edition XS for now just to see what the fuss is about. And if you don’t like it, it’s a very popular model so you can easily sell them on the used market and not lose much given the lower cost. Fit-wise, I also find it more comfortable than the other planars mentioned.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Thank you very much for your reply, you’re right I should probably not break the bank and try the Edition XS first to see if I even like the planar sound. Okay then one final question, currently the Edition XS and the Ananda Stealth are almost exactly the same price. I have heard some negative things about the headband of the Edition XS. Besides the Headband is there any difference between the Edition XS and the Ananda Stealth?

        Like

        Reply

        1. No worries mate, happy to help. I’ve only spent time with the earlier Ananda Stealth, but sonically it sits between the Ananda OG’s soft, airy, ethereal vibe and the Edition XS’s more V-shaped, energetic presentation. The XS headband is pleather so it can peel over time, and some people find the top pressure spot a bit rough. Personally I find it comfier than the Ananda Stealth since it has swivel, but that really comes down to individual fit and preference.

          Like

          Reply

  16. Fantastic review! Which current Hifiman would you say has the strongest bass quantity and impact? From what I’ve read, it might be the Isvarna?

    Like

    Reply

  17. Hi, how would this headphone compare to the HD6XX in terms of tuning and technicalities? and which one would you recommend for someone coming from a hifiman HE400SE? I was initially thinking of getting an edition XS as an overall upgrade but after trying the 6XX I ended up liking the tuning more and was thinking of upgrading to that instead for its smoother and warmer tuning but does the XV provide something like the best of both worlds in terms of tuning and technical performance? thanks

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hey there. The Edition XV is a clear step up from the 6XX in staging, clarity, dynamics, and bass extension. Its tuning leans closer to the 6XX than most planars: fuller, smoother vocals with a touch of colour, while still keeping great clarity. Since you’re coming from the HE400SE and like the 6XX’s tonality, the XV makes a strong middle ground: 6XX-like tuning with big planar technical performance.

      Like

      Reply

  18. Hi there, in your cons you mentioned “Imaging less precise than some competitors” and I’d love to know what headphones you’re refering to so I could check it out. Imaging seems pretty important to me.

    Thank you !

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hey, that’s mainly in comparison to models like the Arya Stealth, Para 2, or HE6se. It’s not that the imaging is bad. It still presents a convincing, holographic feel, but the edges can feel a bit fuzzier by comparison. That said, depending on the genre, that softer presentation can sometimes work in its favour.

      Like

      Reply

      1. I’m asking because I’m aiming at at 300-800 headphone as a first hi-fi buy and I’ve been disappointed by a lot of cans I tried.

        I have a hard time finding pair of cans with neutral leaning slightly bright sound with clarity and separation at this price. Was almost sold on the Arya (XS lacked separation on busy tracks imo) but they gave me a severe and lasting tinnitus after fews sessions so they’re off.

        That’s why I’ve been eyeing on the XV, the Hifiman usual signature sound is too bright for my ear canals so this one could be the right one, that or the Para 2.

        Anyway thank you very much for your precise reviews and your sympathy towards the community it’s always a pleasure to read the comments down here.

        Like

        Reply

        1. Thanks for the kind words, glad to help! Given what you’re after, the Edition XV should still sound clear and spacious while having a warmer, smoother balance than usual Hifimans, so less risk of treble fatigue. To get a similar tone in the Hifiman eggshaped lineup you’d need to step up to the Arya Unveiled.

          The Para 2 is also a solid option in your price range, though it’s a bit brighter and airier than the XV. If the Arya gave you trouble, the XV is probably the safer bet.

          Like

          Reply

          1. Hey, I’m back. So I received the Edition XV and it sounds exactly like your review mentionned. Quite pleasingly surprised since I’m usually more leaning toward a brighter and clearer tune but this one absolutely did the trick.

            Issue is after a mere hour of listening at 60-65 db, the tinnitus buzzing came around. Seems like I need to blacklist planars altogether. Never had this issue before trying them.

            So I’m on the hunt again. I’m eyeing the AR5000, would you say it matches the XV in a way ? Note that I tried the HD600 and I find it unpleasant. In your AR5000 review you mentioned that the HD6 series could feel like lacking air or excitement to some people, and I absolutely am on of them.

            On the other hand, you qualify the AR5000 clarity as mediocre compared to planars. But is it fine compared to other dynamic drivers in your opinion ?

            If you have any other dynamic driven headphones that could please me in your opinion, feel free to list some of them if you don’t mind. Maybe 490 pro, I don’t know.

            Once again, thanks for your inputs on this matter, your call for the XV was perfect for me, too bad my ears are among the few allergics to planars.

            Liked by 1 person

            Reply

            1. Hey! Glad the XV hit the right notes for you tonally, though a shame the tinnitus kicked in. Since the XV already has less treble energy than most Hifimans, I’d agree it’s probably best to avoid planars for now.

              The AR5000 could be a solid direction: it carries some of that XV-like smoothness but with the timbre of a dynamic driver. Clarity won’t match planars, but among dynamics it’s still perfectly respectable.

              For other options, the HD490 Pro is decent but a bit overpriced if you just want a fun listen. Given you like a brighter, airier sound than the HD6 series, you’d probably end up using the mixing pads anyway in which case the HD505/550 get you there for less.

              Focal Clear or Elex are strong picks if you want impact and liveliness without harsh treble. Also worth a look is the EMU Teak: punchy bass, good clarity, though it can lean bright for some. Those are usually my go-to dynamic recs in this price range for keeping things engaging without going overboard.

              Like

              Reply

  19. Im in the market for a new headphone. Iv had the Hifiman he400i (a little too thin sounding for me) I have the 58X which I really like but lacks airiness and details but very enjoyable to listen too. I also love my koss kph40s very comfortable and overall very good headphone for the price. Iv been eyeing the new releases by hifiman i was originally looking at the XS but now im looing at the XV and annada unvieled.

    Basically I want an upgrade over what I have with more detail and air but im worried of going abit too far and getting fatigued and not enjoying my new headphone.

    Iv heard the unvieled series lean more warm than the standard versions so IM wondering if i should go for the Annanda unvieled or the XV or maybe another headphone alltogether? Budget i would like to probably stay under $700. I should also mention they will be dual purpose gaming and music.

    Thank you

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hey there. Given what you’ve liked and disliked so far, the Edition XV looks like a really safe step up. It’s more detailed and airy than the HD58X but still keeps a smoother, warmer balance than most Hifimans, so it shouldn’t get fatiguing. I haven’t tested the Ananda Unveiled yet so can’t comment directly, but under $700 there are plenty of solid options. Do you have any specific preferences around sound or build that matter most to you?

      Like

      Reply
  20. Pingback: HiFiMan HE600 Review(2025): My Real Experience Living With These Headphones

  21. Impressive review and comparison, thanks a lot from all of us. I’m curious if you’ve ever had or heard the Meze 109pro? I’m curious how the XV would compare against it. I have the Meze 109 Pro as well as the XS and I find both of them sometimes a bit hot in the treble and EQ treble is very tricky (even if your EQ for the XS helped immensely). I love the soundstage and precision of the XS which to me is better than my Meze and makes the Meze bloated and closed-in comparaison. The Meze’s qualities are comfort, timber and bass quantity even if I find the mid bass a bit too present for certain genres. With the XV I’m looking at that happy middle ground and the picture you paint of it might just be that (less precise, more laid back but still planar so still more precise than many dynamic HPs with speed for clean bass). What do you think?
    For reference I went HD598 (first audiophile HP) then HD58x (muddy bass for me) then HD6xx (great timber/mids but enough bass/treble to live up to the hype) then Hifiman Sundara (timber too metallic and comfort was off) then Focal Elex (loved it, sold it after getting Meze 109pro as too similar) then Meze 109 (comfy, punchy, meaty but zingy, makes music come alive but info is lost sometimes) then Aune AR5000 (great soundstage but same qualities as Meze with Meze being technically better) and finally Hifiman XS (big surprise, best sound yet for me apart from hot treble). Sorry for the long post and thanks again.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Thanks for the kind words! I haven’t tried the 109 Pro, though some local stores near me stock them and I might give them a go. From your chain of headphones and impressions, I think your read on the XV is pretty much on point. It’s a calmer, fuller balance than the XS without going muddy, while still having most of that planar speed and clarity. Given that you found the 6XX mids spot on and the Sundara sharp/metallic (very useful references), the XV should land in that middle ground pretty well for you.

      Like

      Reply

  22. Hey there, I love the review! It’s extremely detailed and helpful.

    I have a problem though: I’m very undecided between the Meze 105 Aer and the Hifiman Edition XV.
    From what I understand the 105s seem to have a strong and comfortable design, plus a lush and balanced sound. But I do think that they might lack the detail and precision of the XV. I don’t know how they compare in terms of soundstage and imaging but I expect the Hifimans to be a bit better.

    I listen to many genres (prog, alt and post rock, dream pop, trip-hop, post punk, IDM, metal… to name a few) just so you can get an idea.

    Wich one do you think can provide the best experience under most aspects? Thanks for your time.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Thanks for the kind words about the review! I’d really like to help but I haven’t actually heard the 105s yet. I probably should, since they’re quite popular.

      Given the genres you listen to I think the Edition XV would be a good fit. But I can’t comment on how they stack up against the 105. If I get a chance to listen to them, I’ll report back.

      Like

      Reply

    1. I actually get asked about that a lot lol. It’s from Silverstone but it’s discontinued, unfortunately. There’s a similar one from Woo Audio though and I think that one’s still available.

      Like

      Reply

  24. Hi sai,
    I’m looking for an open back, great resolution, great sound stage, with a slight bass emphasis, less than 500$, headphones. Could you please recommend me a headphone with these characteristics.

    Thanks!

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hey! There are definitely a few options, but it depends a bit on what you mean by ‘great’ and if there are specific things you want to avoid. The open-back and bass-emphasis combo is actually kinda tricky and narrows the field a good bit.

      The first ones that pop into my head are the Focal Elex or a used Focal Clear. The staging might be a little mid-tier, but everything else is excellent.

      Then there are the planars: the Audeze LCD-2 Classic (you’ll probably need to EQ for the bass) and the Hifiman Edition XS/XV (also likely needs EQ). Planars in this range often need a little EQ boost for the bass, but they give you awesome resolution and staging. The Arya Stealth is also a great option if you can catch that on sale or for a good used price.

      The Audio-Technica R70x is another one, though it usually sits at the lower end of performance compared to those other options, but it is cheaper.

      Like

      Reply

  25. I currently have the Sundaras but they won´t make it much longer. Also i always missed some punch in the bass. My only other comparison is the Moondrop X Crinacle dusk. I guess i will never reach the bass of an iem with an open back headphone, but maybe you can tell me how the XV compare to the Sundaras and maybe even how close they can get to the dusk (or Harman OE 2018 Target) with EQ.

    Also: How does soundstage and imaging compare to the Sundaras for music and gaming?

    Like

    Reply

    1. Yeah, hitting that pure bass quantity is pretty tough with open-back headphones, though you might get better overall ‘slam’ because of the driver size and the bass effect they have. But honestly, after EQing, the planar over-ears can actually do better than you think. You can basically EQ them to sound like anything since they don’t really have a hard limit like bass clipping or distortion issues.

      Compared to the Sundara, the XV is more flavorful. It has a warmer, fuller sound and more immersive staging. It might not have the bass tightness of the Sundara. Imaging is about a tie: the XV feels bigger/more holographic, but the Sundara is more precise.

      Like

      Reply

  26. Hi, I bought them the other day instead of my Thie Audio – Ghost (I bought them a year ago). My DAC is a Topping DX1, so I want to buy a Topping DX 5 II (this year or next) which was also released in the summer. Overall, it’s better and more enjoyable by all parameters, but I noticed that rock genres (electronic guitars) seems to sound slightly muffled. Is it because of a lack of upper midrange frequencies? P.S. I’m at the beginning of my audiophile journey 🙂

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hey there. So you mean the Edition XV sounds more muffled compared to the Ghost right? I haven’t heard the Ghost, so I can’t really comment on that comparison unfortunately.

      But yes, the XV like a lot of Hifiman models, has a scoop around the 1kHz to 2kHz area. This tends to push the midrange back into the mix a little and softens that sense of bite and attack. I’m guessing that’s where you’re noticing it, especially with things like electric guitars and snare drums.

      Like

      Reply

  28. Hello. I have been using HD 600 as my first proper headphones for last years and been really happy with them. But I wanted something else , especially with more lively bass. And I am thinking about these headphones (would be my first planar ones too!) My question is . Would you recommend it if i mostly use with my sony experia 10 VI phone? I have separate DAC/AMP at home and with it HD600 sound amazing and i know they are hard to drive. But i am more than satisfied with my phone power using HD 600. Will I basically not gonna utilize XVs fully without amp? Should i look for something else? Anything you can recommend within similar price range? Thanks for the review!

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hey, thanks for the kind words. I don’t have experience with your phone model, so I can’t give a totally definite comment.

      That said, you should still be able to get decent volume out of the Sony. The Edition XV isn’t particularly hard to drive. They are already among the easier planars out there, so I don’t think there’s much point in chasing the last bit of efficiency. If you wanted something meaningfully more efficient, it would be something like the Audeze MM-100 Pro.

      If you want a sound similar to your HD 600s, but with planar tactility and that livelier bass, the XVs are indeed a good choice. Otherwise, the Edition XS is also a great option. It costs less and gives you a more different, V-shaped presentation, which would be a nice complement to the HD 600.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Thanks! Honestly it was between this and Sony mdr mv1, both priced similarly around £350 . Wanted something different from hd600s but not overly bright like the usual hifiman signature (according to reviews). Took the plunge and ordered it. Going to try tomorrow. Thanks again for responding

        Like

        Reply

        1. Ah, I see. Coincidentally, I actually just got a pair of the Sony MV1 myself. I would say you made a good choice, as the XVs give you a more different flavour and that planar tech factor compared to your HD600. Hope you enjoy them!

          Like

          Reply

  29. Listener also gave this quite high praise, and my preferences are similar to his so I’m very intrigued! I was wondering just how much you sacrifice in terms of the subjective stuff like soundstage and imaging going from the Arya Unveiled to the XV. I really liked the Arya U, but I found it too on the tad too bright. Not that it was comfortable, but just something I wouldn’t really reach for unless I wanted to ‘wow’ myself with that sense of space, separation, imaging and all that.

    I’m expecting the XV will clearly lag behind in terms of all that stuff, but the question is to what extent. Aside from the mids (that 1-2kHz dip may be a bit much given the overall tonality of the XV), everything else seems to be exactly what I’m looking for. The price difference is another huge factor.

    Would you care to provide your thoughts? If it’s possible to EQ the Arya unveiled to sound more like the XV, that makes things a bit tricky. But then the question arises, would you even want to if achieving that EQ’d sound was to completely change the default sound for the worse?

    Like

    Reply

    1. Yeah I thought he’d love this one haha.

      To me, while it is often tricky to quantify how much of a difference it is, the differences are meaningful, but not as big as the price difference would suggest. The Arya Unveiled is clearly wider and airier, while the Edition XV is more intimate, but still above average in its price category. Since you found the Arya Unveiled too bright, the XV will be a much easier daily driver due to its warmer tone.

      I would suggest tinkering with EQ first since you already have the Arya Unveiled, which is an excellent, highly capable headphone that responds well to EQ. In other words, you can easily EQ it to sound very close to the warmer tonal balance of the XV. In most cases, if done right, EQ tends to improve the sound for the better.

      For example, try this on your Arya Unveiled (for XV-style tuning):
      Preamp: 0.0 dB
      Filter 1: ON PK Fc 4800 Hz Gain -3.5 dB Q 2.600
      Filter 2: ON PK Fc 8000 Hz Gain -2.0 dB Q 3.000
      Filter 3: ON PK Fc 10500 Hz Gain -3.0 dB Q 4.000

      And if you want a full EQ profile from bass to upper treble (adjust the first and last filters to taste):
      Preamp: -5.0 dB
      Filter 1: ON PK Fc 30 Hz Gain 5.0 dB Q 0.500
      Filter 2: ON PK Fc 220 Hz Gain -1.0 dB Q 1.500
      Filter 3: ON PK Fc 4000 Hz Gain 1.0 dB Q 0.500
      Filter 4: ON PK Fc 4800 Hz Gain -3.5 dB Q 2.600
      Filter 5: ON PK Fc 8000 Hz Gain -2.0 dB Q 3.000
      Filter 6: ON PK Fc 10500 Hz Gain -3.0 dB Q 4.000
      Filter 7: ON PK Fc 15500 Hz Gain 3.0 dB Q 2.000

      Like

      Reply

      1. Awesome thank you! Yeah, I find these presets help quite a bit. Especially the cut at the 4-6kHz region and at the 8kHz mark. Also surprised by how much you can crank the bass on this to give that sense of bloom and warmth. Having said that, I’m still eager to try the Edition XV one day just to get for its sound and given the hype it has received.

        Like

        Reply

        1. Edit: also because I’m curious to decide for myself just how far apart the Edition XV is compared to the Arya Unveiled. Because while I do enjoy a lot of aspects of the Arya Unveiled, I must admit the price is something that irks be in retrospect (especially given how much Hifiman drops the price). I’ve tried enough kilobuck headphones to get a good enough idea of what to expect (so I don’t feel this urge to “find out what is beyond”) and also of my personal tastes. And I still think Arya Unveiled is a Hifiman headphone I can finally enjoy, but it still has some minor problematic elements (like that pesky lower treble). I’m kind of in that phase where I don’t mind sacrificing “technicalities” (within reason) as long as the tonality is what I want – and the Edition XV seems to offer that at a much more palatable price (at least one that I think is within the range that most consumers would want to go to).

          But that’s enough of my ramblings.

          Like

          Reply

        2. Glad those presets helped! Yeah, definitely give the XV a shot if you get the chance. It is almost never possible to EQ one headphone to sound exactly like another.

          P.S. Totally understand your point about the price and value. The XV is definitely appealing at a much more palatable price, especially when the tonality seems to align so well with what you want. If you do not mind sacrificing some of the perceived qualities, perhaps also try some dynamic cans like the Focal Clear series?

          Like

          Reply

          1. Funny you mentioned that because I did own the original Clear a while back but sold it due to the god awful materials Focals used on it. The microfibres degraded crazy fast and I had to use different ear pads and a headband cover which just made the headphone uncomfortable to wear and it was already worn to a point where the headband would creak a ton. I like the sound, but not worth keeping. IMO, comfort and practicality is king alongside sound. In any case, I’ll give the XV a listen and see how it goes!

            Like

            Reply

            1. Yeah the Clear pads degrade pretty easily it’s a real shame. Though there seem to be more aftermarket options popping up nowadays that get really close to the original sound signature, which is a good thing. Enjoy your demo!

              Like

              Reply

              1. Okay, so I tried the XV… and bought them. My observations were exactly the same as yours. There is indeed a notable difference in terms of that sense of ‘spaciousness’ and clarity. But as I mentioned, I’m now at a stage where I would rather a headphone have better tuning than better technicalities, if it means that having the latter results in compromises to the former. And the Arya Unveiled is kind of like that… thought still MUCH better than the previous Hifiman models. Even after EQ, I still prefer the XV’s sound.

                In an ideal world, I would have been probably kept both headphones since I think Arya Unveiled is still awesome for certain genres of music, but in this economy (and Hifiman’s price slashing tactics, which is pretty pro-consumer don’t get me wrong), anything above at or above $2k AU better be a miracle headphone for me to consider at this point (lol). Closest thing to that would be the heddphone D1 (at least from the reviews it has gotten), but even that feels a tad pricey (though I understand its due to the amount of R&D involved). Speaking of which, think you’ll do a review on that soon?

                In any case, thank you again for your reviews and your comments. Really appreciate the work you do!

                Like

                Reply

                1. Hey, thanks for the kind words. I am very happy to hear you enjoy the XVs!

                  Indeed, the XV is just so well-tuned overall. Yeah in many ways there’s still a gap when comparing it to the Aryas, but that doesn’t mean the same thing for everyone. Listener’s reviews are excellent, and he mentioned the XVs gave him the largest soundstage almost out of all the Hifiman models. Things like that really goes to show how subjective the experience can be and how different headphones interact with our hearing.

                  So you’re Aussie too? I’m defintely excited about the Heddphone D1, but it looks like we do not have anywhere with them in stock for demo yet. Hopefully soon, though.

                  Like

                  Reply

  30. Would you recommend XV as an upgrade to Beyerdynamics 770 Pro (80ohm), used with Fiio K5 Pro ESS. I am looking for something to replace my Beyers and I want to try open-back this time around, I am just a little confused as what headphones to choose, mainly I listed to some EDM, Hip-Hop so I am worried about bass extension on open-back headphones, especially planars from what I can see on the graphs for different models. Thanks for any advice.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hi there. They are certainly very different from your Beyers, being an open-back planar. If the XV fits your typical use case, I think they would work quite well for the genres you mentioned.

      As for your concern about bass extension: Hifiman planars generally have very good, linear sub-bass extension, so that won’t be an issue. If you find the quantity isn’t as ample as the closed-back Beyers, you could easily boost it up with some EQ.

      Like

      Reply

  31. I’ve had an Sennheiser HD 600 for 15 years as a daily driver. A few years ago I got the itch to try something new and landed on the Beyerdynamic DT 1990. I don’t dislike the 1990, but it can be a little much sometimes, so recently I got the itch to try something new again. Maybe the Hifiman Edition XV is what I’m looking for?

    I wouldn’t call myself an audiophile so it’s hard for me to describe what it is I’m looking for. I still love the HD 600, but sometimes it can sound a bit boring with the genres that I listen to (mostly prog metal and electronic). It seems like the XV might be a better fit for these genres, but I’m worried that it might not different enough from the HD 600 which I already own. Do you you think it would be worth own an XV if I already have an HD 600 that I enjoy?

    Like

    Reply

    1. I see. Given what you dislike about the DT 1990, the Edition XV might suit you well with its linear planar bass that goes nicely with the subbass rumble in the genres you mentioned. Compared to the HD 600, the XV sounds more laid back in the mids and more extended in the bass. It definitely has that planar type of sound. Other than the XV, I can think of upgrade pathways like the Focal Clear and the EMU TEAK.

      Like

      Reply

      1. I’ve never heard a planar magnetic headphone before, so that has me really curious to see how I might like it. The Focal Clear has come up a lot during my research, and I think I’d really like it, but I’m hesitant to buy because the replacement ear pads are very expensive and it doesn’t look like I can replace the padding in the band when that eventually wears too.

        I’m going to give the XV a shot and keep the Focal Clear in mind when I eventually get the itch again. Thanks for your thoughts!

        Like

        Reply

        1. Aha is that right. Yeah the Clear pads do degrade pretty easily, and replacement pads cost a fortune. Though, nowadays there seem to be more aftermarket options popping up that get really close to the original sound.

          Given that, the XV certainly looks like a promising alternative. Hope you enjoy it!

          Like

          Reply

  32. I was looking for something to compliment my 6xx and the xv might potentially be what I’ve been looking for. The xv was the first ever hifiman I tried that had the egg shell earcups design.

    Earcups were very spacious and comfortable, and clamp force was perfect coming from the 6xx which always felt a bit too tight to me. I also happened to try the xs after the xv but they were a bit too loose in terms of clamp force.

    When it came to the sound of the xv, the one thing I instantly picked up from the first few seconds of listening to a song was that there was a certain height to the sound, it sounded quite tall and things sounded like they were coming from slightly above my head in front. Beside that, I really enjoyed the tonality of the xv, warm and thick, which felt a bit reminiscence of my 6xx.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment